The Oliver Curry thing explained.

October 29, 2007

I didn’t post about the ridiculous evolutionary story peddled as science by the BBC because it was all over the bloggotubes and the press misrepresenting science is pretty ho-hum to me.  There’s an unnatural law that says you should never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by incompetence, which I think in general works well.  But in these case, as Ben Goldacre of the Guardian points out at Bad Science, this case is actually more complicated.

How does this happen? The “research” – or “essay” – was paid for by Bravo, a bikini and fast car “men’s TV channel” celebrating its 21st year in operation…[SNIP]…I spoke to friends on other newspapers (the Guardian didn’t cover the story, mercifully) who told me they had stand up rows with news desks, explaining that this was not a science news story. But the selective pressure on national newspapers is for journalists who compliantly write up this kind of commercial puff nonsense as “science news”, while religious fundamentalism of all varieties is conquering the world. Bravo!


One comment

  1. […] Check it out! While looking through the blogosphere we stumbled on an interesting post today.Here’s a quick excerpt […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: